IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J.
Miriyala Vajram – Petitioner
Versus
The State of AP., Rep PP. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.35 of 2017
Decided On : 03-04-2023
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 5(m), 6 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 376(2)(i) – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Offence of Rape - Penetrative sexual assault – Appeal against conviction - Accused committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault on victim girl – Held, Trial Court on proper appreciation of evidence on record adduced by prosecution, recorded a clear finding that accused committed said offence of penetrative sexual assault against victim girl PW.2 - Trial Court also has given cogent reasons for placing reliance on testimony of victim girl, who is minor, and also on testimony of her mother, who is PW.1 - Upon reappraisal of said evidence on record and after subjecting same to judicial scrutiny, Court also found that evidence of PW.1 and PW.2 is trustworthy and that nothing was elicited in their cross-examination to discredit their testimony and their evidence coupled with medical evidence of PW.7 clinchingly proves that accused is guilty of committing said offence - Impugned judgment of conviction and sentence imposed against appellant is perfectly sustainable under law and it does not warrant interference in this Appeal and same is not liable to be set aside – Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Assailing the judgment, dated 30.09.2016, passed in Special Sessions Case No.9 of 2016 on the file of the Special Judge under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act-cum-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, whereby the appellant, who is the sole accused in the said case, was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 5(m) r/w. Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, (for short, the “POCSO Act”), r/w. Section 376(2)(i) of IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, and, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months, for the aforesaid offence, the instant Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant.
2. Facts germane to dispose of this Criminal Appeal, as unfolded from the evidence of the prosecution witnesses examined in the case during the course of trial, may, briefly, be stated as follows:
(b) On 03.06.2015 at about 4.30 p.m., the two daughters of PW.1 i.e., her elder daughter and the victim girl PW.2, along with other children of the locality, have been playing in a vacant site located behind the house of PW.1. At that time, the accused came to that place and offered chocolates to the children playing at that place and lured them. Other children went away from the said place. But, PW.2, who is the victim girl, who is a minor, followed him as he lured her by offering chocolates to the said child and he took her into his house. Thereafter, the accused made her lie near the hearth in his house and lifted her skirt and laid on the minor girl, PW.2, and did an activity on the minor girl.
(c) The elder sister of PW.2, who was also a minor girl, who went away along with other children after the accused lured them by offering chocolates to them, went and informed to her mother, who is PW.1, that the accused took PW.2 into his house by offering chocolates to her. Suspecting some danger to her minor daughter PW.2, PW.1 immediately rushed to the house of the accused and when she went into the house of the accused, she saw the accused lying on her minor daughter PW.2. Immediately, when she raised shouts, the accused got up and pushed PW.1 aside and ran away from his house. PW.1 checked the clothes and private parts of her minor daughter PW.2. She found semen stains on her stomach and skirt and found that the accused committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl. She immediately, brought PW.2 to her house and informed the said fact to the neighbours and relatives. PW.1 took her minor daughter PW.2 to the hospital.
(d) On receipt of intimation from the Medical Officer on Duty, Pw.9, who is the Head Constable of Devarapalli Police Station, went to the hospital and recorded the statement of PW.1. On the basis of the said statement, he registered a case in Crime No.79 of 2015 of Devarapalli Police Station, against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 376(2) of IPC and Section 5(m) r/w.Sec.6 of the POCSO Act. Thereafter, PW.10, who is the Inspector of Police, took-up investigation in this case. On the instructions of PW.11, PW.8, a woman constable, recorded the statement of the victim girl, who is a minor, examined as PW.2. Thereafter, PW.11, who is the Investigating Officer, examined the scene of offence in the presence of mediators and also examined the witnesses and recorded their statements. He ha
The court established that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction, and that slight penetration constitutes an offense under the POCSO Act, regardless of t....
The court affirms that minor victims' testimonies can be solely relied upon in sexual offence cases, provided they are credible, and clarifies that penetration into external genitalia suffices to con....
The prosecution must prove the age of the victim under the POCSO Act; absence of verifiable evidence led to the acquittal due to reliance on untrustworthy testimony.
The absence of penetration is critical for a conviction under Sections 5(i) and 6 of the POCSO Act, but the presence of injuries can still lead to a conviction for aggravated sexual assault under Sec....
The necessity of proving penetration or manipulation causing penetration for charges under the POCSO Act was emphasized, leading to a conviction for attempted offences.
Conviction for sexual assault can rely on victim testimony alone, even in the absence of physical evidence, provided the testimony is credible.
The appellant's position of trust and authority over the child victim led to his conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.