B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Paramata Raja Sekhar – Respondent
COMMON JUDGMENT:
MACMA 1000/2012 is directed by the 3rd respondent/New India Assurance Company Limited, Rajahmundry, against the order dated 23.08.2010 passed in M.V.O.P.No.278/2008 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal- VI Addl. District Judge (FTC), Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
2. MACMA 2232/2015 is directed by the 4th respondent/ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, Rajahmundry, against the order dated 23.08.2010 passed in M.V.O.P.No.278/2008 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal- VI Addl. District Judge (FTC), Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are arrayed as parties before the tribunal.
4. The MVOP 278/2008 was filed U/s.166 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.3,03,000/- for the damage of the car of the claimant against the 1st respondent/driver of the lorry bearing No.AP 30T 6081, owner of the lorry/2nd respondent of the lorry bearing No.AP 30T 6081, 3rd respondent/New India Assurance Company Limited/insurer of the lorry bearing No.AP 30T 6081 i.e., appellant in MACMA 1000/2012 and 4th respondent/ appellant in MACMA 2232/2015/ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited/insure
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.