IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J.
A.B. Venkateswara Rao S/o Late Balaswamy - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Prl. Secretary, General Administration Dept.(GAD), Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 15455 of 2023
Decided On : 28-06-2023
Permission - Government Service - Office Memorandum F.No.11013/8/2015-Estt.A-III - Summary of the Office Memorandum and its interpretation by the court
Fact of the Case:
The Writ Petitioner sought permission and earned leave for a private foreign visit. The authorities did not communicate their decision within a reasonable time, leading to the filing of the Writ Petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Writ Petitioner was deemed to have obtained permission to travel abroad as per the Office Memorandum. However, the inaction on the part of the authorities regarding the earned leave request was deemed illegal and unsustainable.
Issues: The issues included the inaction of the authorities in considering the Writ Petitioner's request for earned leave and the legality of the suspension and its impact on the leave request.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the inaction of the authorities in not communicating a decision within a reasonable time was illegal and unsustainable. It also ruled that suspension cannot be a reason for depriving an individual's liberty to travel abroad.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was allowed, and the Respondent No.2 was directed to render a decision on the earned leave request by a specified date.
ORDER :
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J.
Heard Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Javvaji Sarath Chandra, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri V. Maheswara Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Home and General Administration Department appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the following relief:
3. It is averred in the Affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition that the Writ Petitioner has received an “Invite” on 08.05.2023 from the Telugu Association of North America (TANA) to attend a Conference as a special guest, to be held from 07.07.2023 to 09.07.2023 in United States of America. In pursuance of this “Invite”, the Writ Petitioner has made a request vide Letter No.2/2023 dated 05.06.2023 for sanction of 41 days of Earned Leave from 21.06.2023 to 31.07.2023 (both days inclusive) to the Respondent No.3 namely the Director General of Police (HoPF) and also an Application vide Letter No.3/2023 dated 05.06.2023 to the Respondent No.2 namely the State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Chief Secretary. He sought “for permission to visit U.S.A and U.K on private affairs”. It is also stated in the Affidavit that the Writ Petitioner has submitted all the details regarding his foreign visit in the required proforma and FORM FC-2 along with ‘declaration’ dated 05.06.2023.
4. Since the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have not communicated their decision within a reasonable time, the present Writ Petition has been filed seeking declaration that the inaction on the part of the Respondent Authorities in not considering the request/application dated 05.06.2023, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to the Office Memorandum bearing F.No.11013/8/2015-Estt.III of Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Department of Personnel & Training (Establishment Division) dated 27.07.2015 (Ex.P.4). A consequential direction is also sought to the Respondent Authorities to pass necessary Orders for granting the Earned Leave sought by the Writ Petitioner for the foreign visit for a period of 41 days from the date of availing of the leave.
5. Learned Senior Counsel submits that two permissions are required to be obtained for an Employee in the Government Service to travel abroad namely :
b) For sanction of leave
6. Learned Senior Counsel would submit that insofar as the permission required for travelling abroad is concerned, it is governed by the Office Memorandum bearing F.No.11013/8/2015-Estt.III of Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Department of Personnel & Training (Establishment Division) dated 27.07.2015 (Ex.P.4). He submits tha
Inaction of authorities in not communicating a decision within a reasonable time is illegal and unsustainable. Suspension cannot deprive an individual's liberty to travel abroad.
The circular regulating foreign travel permits for court staff does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution, as it serves a legitimate administrative purpose and does not unjustly discrimin....
If a pure administrative circular/executive instruction is in conflict with certain rules and regulations, former would be bad in law.
Right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution and cannot be restricted without established law; mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings does not justify denial ....
The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, which cannot be curtailed by the pendency of departmental proceedings without due process.
The issuance of a Leave India Notice under the Foreigners Act is lawful when based on documented misrepresentation, upholding regulatory authority without violating natural justice requirements.
The main legal point established is the requirement for procedural safeguards in the issuance of Look Out Circulars, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice and a fair, just, and reaso....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.