Back
A. V. SESHA SAI, R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Bandi Chinna Ahobilappa , S/o. Late Bandi Obulesu – Appellant
Versus
B. Musalanna , S/o. Late Bandi Obulesu – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
A.V. Sesha Sai, J.
1. Heard Sri Sriman, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri M. Karibasaiah, learned counsel for respondent No.1/writ petitioner, and Sri G. L. Narasimha Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Assignment, appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 6, and perused the material available on record.
2. Respondent No.6 in W.P. No.11746 of 2021 is the appellant in the present appeal, preferred under Clause 15 of Letters Patent.
3. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 06.08.2021 passed by the learned single Judge, allowing the said writ petition, filed by respondent No.1 herein.
4. By way of the order impugned in the appeal, the learned single Judge had set aside the order dated 24.04.2021 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District, allowing the appeal filed by the appellant herein. Appellant herein submitted a representation/application to the Tahsildar, Atmakuru on 05.06.2020 stating that irregular entries were made in the revenue records in favour of respondent No.1 herein with regard to the subject property of the writ petition.
5. The Tahsildar, Atmakuru, vide endorsement dated 30.06.2020, asked the appellant herein to approac
An appeal under Section 5(5) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 is only maintainable against an order making or refusing an amendment in the Record of Rights.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the limitation on the Revenue Divisional Officer's authority to treat an application as an appeal and the requirement for parties to follow the ....
A Revisioning Authority under the ROR Act cannot unilaterally cancel a pattadar passbook without assigning reasons, especially when the holder of the passbook has material documents indicating their ....
Section 5 of the Act makes it clear that appeal against the order under Section 6-A of the Act is not maintainable, as issuance of Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed or making entries thereon is alway....
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER HAS NO JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN A REPRESENTATION QUESTIONING THE MUTATION OF NAMES IN REVENUE RECORDS WITHOUT AN APPEAL BEING FILED UNDER SECTION 5(5) OF THE ROR ACT.
The main legal point established is the requirement of notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing orders under Sec.5(3) of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattedar Passb....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
