J. SREENIVAS RAO
Chandra Mohan S/o Late Shri Ram Prathap – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, Nizamabad District – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed seeking following relief:
2. Brief facts of the case:
Asst. Collector, CE vs. N.T. Co. of India Limited
Chinnam Pandurangam vs. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal and Others
J. Krishnamachari vs. State Government of Andhra Pradesh
Prakash Chand Sharma and Others vs. Narendra Nath Sharma
Peddi Sailaja and Another vs. State and Others
Ratnamma vs. RDO, Dharmavaram, Ananthapur District and Others
Sannepalli Nageswar Rao and Another vs. District Collector, Khammam and Others
The central legal point established in the judgment is the limitation on the Revenue Divisional Officer's authority to treat an application as an appeal and the requirement for parties to follow the ....
The Revenue Divisional Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate applications for land mutation, which must be filed before the Tahsildar according to the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pa....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to adhere to principles of natural justice and the prescribed method and procedure when exercising statutory powers.
The revisional jurisdiction under Section 9 of the ROR Act cannot be exercised after a long delay, and the settled rights of a person under the ROR Act cannot be unsettled after a lapse of more than ....
The main legal point established is the requirement of notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing orders under Sec.5(3) of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattedar Passb....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.