Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Vuppu Shivanagaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Mr.S.Lakshmikanth, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.N.Bhujanga Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.5.
2. The petitioners have approached this Court, seeking the following relief :
3. The averments as per the affidavit filed by the petitioners in support of the present writ petition, in brief are as under:
A Revisioning Authority under the ROR Act cannot unilaterally cancel a pattadar passbook without assigning reasons, especially when the holder of the passbook has material documents indicating their ....
Revenue authorities may not adjudicate on civil title disputes under A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act; parties should approach civil court for resolution.
The court emphasized the necessity of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention in land disputes, affirming that the right of appeal must be explicitly provided by law.
The court emphasized that pattadar passbooks must be issued only after valid mutation proceedings, and any orders issued without such proceedings are void.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER HAS NO JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN A REPRESENTATION QUESTIONING THE MUTATION OF NAMES IN REVENUE RECORDS WITHOUT AN APPEAL BEING FILED UNDER SECTION 5(5) OF THE ROR ACT.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
