Back
RAVI NATH TILHARI, K. MANMADHA RAO
Shaik Ahmmad, S/o. Bade Saheb – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt. , School Education Dept. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.
Heard Sri Maganti Sai Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for School Education for the respondents 1 to 4. No representation for the respondents 5 to 8.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order passed by Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (in short the A.P.A.T) in O.A.No.770 of 2010, dated 22.03.2012, with further direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Headmaster, Grade-II, before promoting the unofficial respondents after reckoning the petitioner’s seniority and promotion as Low Female Literacy (for short, LFL) Headmaster/School Assistant with effect from 21.06.1998.
3. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher on 01.02.1984 and obtained 16 years automatic timescale on 31.01.2000. He worked in various Elementary Schools and High Schools as SGT. He was promoted as School Assistant (SA) Telugu on 04.03.2006. The respondent No.5 was appointed as SGT on 01.04.1984 and was junior to the petitioner. The respondent Nos.6 to 8 were also appointe
The right to be considered for promotion is a fundamental right, and delay or laches in approaching the court/Tribunal may not always be considered as fatal to the legitimate claim of the aggrieved p....
Promotions must be made in accordance with the merit-cum-seniority list prepared as per Rule 3 of G.O.Ms.No.15 dated 26.01.2009, and ignoring seniority to promote juniors is a violation of the rule p....
Point of Law : Education Officer (Secondary) can exercise jurisdiction to determine any inter se dispute as regards seniority that has been referred to him under Rule 12(3) of the said Rules till suc....
Promotion is not a vested right and an employee only has the right to be considered for promotion.
Rule 44 reads as appointment of Headmasters shall ordinarily be according to seniority from the seniority list prepared.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
