SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1353

K. MANMADHA RAO
Doosi Rama Rao – Appellant
Versus
Puttutu Munirathnam Reddy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.C.Reddy, Advocate, N.Bharath Babu, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner against the Order, dtd. 25/1/2016 passed in I.A.No.1668 of 2015 in O.S No.289 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti (for short "the trial Court").

2. Heard Sri P.C. Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri N. Bharath Babu, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. The present impugned I.A.No.1668 of 2015 in O.S No.289 of 2008 was filed by the petitioner under Sec. 45 of Indian Evidence Act seeking to send the agreement Ex.A1 along with the admitted signatures of the defendant to the Government handwriting expert, Forensic Science Laboratory to compare his signatures on the Ex.A1 with the admitted signatures of the petitioner are one and same.

4. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent denied his signature on the agreement of Sale dtd. 24/3/1997 which was marked as Ex.A3 and the scribe and attestor of the document who examined as PWs.2 and 3 were gained over by the defendant and they did not support his case, hence it is just and necessary for him to send the document to the handwriting expert along with admitted signatures of the defendant availabl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top