JUDGMENT

1. The revision petitioner, among the other contentions, mainly stressed that the decree cannot be executed by the legal representative of the deceased DHr as the succession certificate was issued in a petition barred by limitation.

2. This civil revision petition is filed under Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ('CPC') against the order dtd. 27/7/2022 allowing E.P. No.34 of 2019 in O.S. No.11 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Amalapuram, passed under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC in the execution petition filed under Order XXI, Rule 48 CPC for attachment of the salary of the judgment debtor (JDr) for realization of the decreetal amount.

3. Heard Sri T.Vishnu Teja, learned counsel for the revision petitioner.

4. The revision petitioner is the JDr /defendant and the respondents are legal representatives of the decree holder (decree holder is the plaintiff).

5. The case of the petitioners is briefly as follows:

Sri Saladi Tata Rao, the father of the petitioners obtained a decree on 15/3/2008 against the defendant/JDr before Lok Adalat, Amalapuram, in O.S. No.11 of 2008. As per the decree, the JDr has to pay Rs.1,60,000.00 to the decree holder on or b