SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1530

B. S. BHANUMATHI
Musunuri Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Tummala Indira Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Petitioner Counsel: Party-in-person

JUDGMENT /RDER :

In view of Order XXII Rule 12 CPC, question arose in the present case, as to what happens to the proceedings for execution of a decree for permanent injunction under Order XXI Rule 32 CPC, when judgment-debtor dies pending the execution proceedings.

2. This application has been filed by the petitioner/party-in-person seeking the following prayer :

    "......to pass order directing the Registry to add the word "died" after the name of 4th respondent Gorijavolu Rajendra Prasad in the cause title of CRP No.2634 of 2023 and to pass such other order or orders that are necessary in the interest of justice."

3. It is stated in Paragraph No.4 of the affidavit filed in support of the petition that the 4th respondent, namely, Gorijavolu Rajendra Prasad expired on 19.07.2024, and one of his legal representatives, i.e., his wife, by name, Gorijavolu Pavani, is on record as the 5th respondent, that there is sufficient representation in the matter from the legal representative of the deceased 4th respondent and hence, there is no necessity of bringing all the legal representatives on record in the place of the deceased 4th respondent, and that it is necessary to incorporate changes i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top