SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1435

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
Kundrapu Yarrayyamma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.V.N.Narayana Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The writ petitioners in both these writ petitions are common. In W.P.No.353/2018, there are six respondents, out of which respondents 1, 2, 3 and 5 are arrayed as respondents 1 to 4 in W.P.No.1779/2018. The pleadings of parties in both the writ petitions are identical.

2. The petitioners' case is thus:

(a) The petitioners 1 to 5 are legal heirs of one Kundrapu Appala Naidu and 6th petitioner is the son of late Koruprolu Dalayya. Kundrapu Appala Naidu and Koruprolu Dalayya jointly purchased an agricultural land in an extent of Ac.3.00 cents vide Patta No.8 of Bhimavarapukota, Kotanandur Mandal, East Godavari District under a registered Sale Deed dtd. 30/5/1955 vide document No.1764/1955. Ever since they were in joint possession and enjoyment of the said land.

(b) The 3rd respondent acquired an extent of Ac.7.78 cents of land covered by Sy.nos.47/1A, 47/1B and 47/3A in an extent of Ac.1.36 cents, Ac.0.90 cents and Ac.0.72 cents belong to the petitioners and some other lands of others for issuing house site pattas to the houseless poor. In Sec. 4(1) notification, the name of Koruprolu Dalayya i.e., father of 6th petitioner was shown, however, both the joint owners had agree

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top