JUDGMENT

RAVI NATH TILHARI,J. - Heard Sri K. Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Mallampalli Srinivas, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondents.

2. I.A.No.3 of 2023, is for setting aside the order dated 03. 07.2023 dismissing the writ petition for want of prosecution.

3. The cause for non-appearance on the date fixed 3/7/2023, is sufficient. The order dtd. 3/7/2023 is recalled. The petition is restored to its original number.

4. With the consent of the parties counsels, we have heard on the merits of the writ petition today itself.

5. The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following relief:-

"It is therefore prayed that this Hon"ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari by calling for the records from the respondents and set-aside the order passed in OA.No.372 of 2011 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench on 7/11/2014 pass such other order or orders as this Hon"ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

6. The petitioner No.1 is the deceased applicant, in O.A.No.372 of 2011, who died during pendency of O.A before Central Administrative