Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
N. Lakshmikantha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
S. Mohammed Hussain – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Aggrieved by the orders dtd. 13/6/2016 passed in C.F.R.No.3310 of 2016 in unnumbered suit, on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, (in short 'the court below') the present revision is filed.
2. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs; respondents herein are the defendants before the court below.
3. The petitioners herein has filed a suit for amendment of registered sale deed No. 2904 of 2004, dtd. 18/3/2004. The court below taken objection 6/4/2016 and returned the plaint and the counsel for the petitioners represented the same, which was taken up by the court below on 2/5/2016. The court below after perusal of the plaint, came to conclusion that as per Article 137 of Limitation Act, when there is no specific provision in the Act, for the relief 3 years is the limitation. Therefore as per Limitation Act, the suit is not within time and that rejected the plaint. Assailing the same, the present revision came to be filed.
4. Heard Mr. Shafath Ahmed Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. G. Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the 1st respondent. The 2nd respondent is shown as formal party to the revision.
5. Learned counsel for the petit
The question of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact and cannot be decided solely based on the reading of the plaint without proper pleadings, framing of an issue of limitation, and taking ....
The court clarified that knowledge of encroachment does not imply knowledge of a sale deed, impacting the limitation period for filing a suit.
The amendment of pleadings will be allowed even after the expiry of the statutory period of limitation if it does not constitute the addition of a new cause of action or raise a different case, but a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a suit can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC if it is found to be manifestly vexatious and without merit, and does not disclose a....
Amendments to a plaint are permissible before trial commences if they do not introduce a new cause of action that is time-barred, preserving the rights of the defendants.
The court established that limitation issues can involve mixed questions of law and fact, which cannot be resolved at the preliminary stage of proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
