SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1475

K. MANMADHA RAO
N. Lakshmikantha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
S. Mohammed Hussain – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shafath Ahmed Khan, Advocate, G.Sravan Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Aggrieved by the orders dtd. 13/6/2016 passed in C.F.R.No.3310 of 2016 in unnumbered suit, on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, (in short 'the court below') the present revision is filed.

2. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs; respondents herein are the defendants before the court below.

3. The petitioners herein has filed a suit for amendment of registered sale deed No. 2904 of 2004, dtd. 18/3/2004. The court below taken objection 6/4/2016 and returned the plaint and the counsel for the petitioners represented the same, which was taken up by the court below on 2/5/2016. The court below after perusal of the plaint, came to conclusion that as per Article 137 of Limitation Act, when there is no specific provision in the Act, for the relief 3 years is the limitation. Therefore as per Limitation Act, the suit is not within time and that rejected the plaint. Assailing the same, the present revision came to be filed.

4. Heard Mr. Shafath Ahmed Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. G. Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the 1st respondent. The 2nd respondent is shown as formal party to the revision.

5. Learned counsel for the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top