K. MANMADHA RAO
Kosaraju Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
Kosaraju Gopala Krishna (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The Second Appeal has been filed assailing the Judgment and Decree dtd. 16/4/2014, passed in A.S.No.47 of 2011 by the learned II Additional District Judge, Guntur (in short "the first appellate court") in setting aside the Judgment and decree dtd. 7/10/2009 in O.S.No.98 of 2001 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla (in short "the trial court").
2. The parties will herein after be referred to as they are arrayed in the Original Suit for the sake of convenience.
3. The Appellants herein are the plaintiffs; 1st respondent is the 5th defendant before the trial court, who died and his legal representatives i.e respondents 2 to 4 came on record as per orders of this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 dtd. 31/12/2021. The defendants 2 and 3 were given up by the plaintiffs in the suit.
4. The plaintiffs filed the suit seeking to pass a Preliminary Decree for partition of the plaint schedule items 1 to 4 into three equal shares by metes and bounds with reference to good and bad qualities and to allot two such shares to the plaintiffs and for delivery of possession of the same and for future profits.
The averments in the plaint, in brief are as under:-
The plaint schedule prope
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of evaluating the evidence on record, discussing legal provisions scrupulously, and considering material aspects in reaching a decis....
The court established that valid adoption requires proof of giving and taking by biological and adoptive parents, which was not demonstrated, leading to equal shares among heirs.
For a valid adoption under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, the biological parents must give the child in adoption, and the adoptive parents must take the child, which was not proven in this c....
Adoption – Ceremony of adoption may vary depending upon circumstances of each case, but for a valid adoption there has to be ceremony of giving and taking of child in adoption.
The court ruled that the alleged adoption was not proved and the will was surrounded by suspicious circumstances, entitling the plaintiffs to partition of the properties.
The court established that the validity of adoption and wills must be proven with clear evidence, impacting the rights to property succession.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.