V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Kolli Konda (died) – Appellant
Versus
Kolli Somulamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(V. Gopala Krishna Rao, J.)
This Appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure [for short ‘the C.P.C.’], is filed by the Appellants/defendants challenging the Decree and Judgment, dated 31.07.2000, in O.S. No.4 of1999 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narsipatnam [for short ‘the trial Court’]. The Respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the said Suit.
2. The respondents/plaintiffs filed the Suit in O.S.No.4 of 1999 for partition of ABC schedule properties into 12 equal shares and to allot seven such shares to the plaintiffs and put them in possession of such 7 shares and for grant of future profits and for costs.
3. Both the parties in the Appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court.
4. The brief averments of the plaint, in O.S. No.4 of 1999, are as under:
Late Kolli Kannamanaidu, undivided son of the defendants 1 and 2, married the first plaintiff about 10 years back at Kotha Thutipala as per Hindu Law and caste custom, immediately after marriage, the marriage was consummated and since then the first plaintiff lived with her husband and lead marital life till about 7 years. The defendants 1 and 2, the fourth defendant i.e., da
Golavalli Ramakrishna Murthy vs. Muramalla Ammanna Raju and others
G.Vasu vs. Syed Yaseen Sifuddin Quadri
Laxmibai (dead) through L.Rs and another vs. Bhagwantbuva (dead) through L.Rs and others
Kishori Lal vs. Mst. Chaltibai
M. Vanaja vs. M.Sarla devi (dead)
Rani Purnima Debi and another vs. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb and another
The court ruled that the alleged adoption was not proved and the will was surrounded by suspicious circumstances, entitling the plaintiffs to partition of the properties.
The court established that the validity of adoption and wills must be proven with clear evidence, impacting the rights to property succession.
Proof of execution of Will – In cases where document sought to be proved is required by law to be attested, same cannot let be in evidence unless at least one of attesting witnesses has been called f....
Point of law: A perfectly valid adoption deed can be made without an adoption deed and any status which the adopted son gets by virtue of adoption is due to the proper ceremonies being performed and ....
The court upheld the trial Court's decree for partition, ruling that the alleged Will was not proved, affirming the properties as joint family assets.
The court upheld the validity of an undated Will which excluded the plaintiff from the property, ruling that her delay and knowledge of the Will barred her claim to partition.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the adoption deed and the plaintiff's lack of locus standi to question the adoption.
The burden of proof lies on the party alleging fraud in the execution of a will, and the plaintiffs successfully proved the validity of the will dated 17.03.1994.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to inherit property and take a legacy is contingent upon the validity of the adoption and compliance with the legal provisions....
Will – Mode of proving Will does not ordinarily differ from that of any other document except as to special requirement of attestation prescribed in Section 63 of Indian Succession Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.