SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 169

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Nara Chandrababu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts of the case and allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. response and counter-allegations (Para 5)
3. legal frameworks and procedural principles for bail (Para 6 , 12 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 24 , 26 , 32 , 33 , 35)
4. principles of anticipatory bail from precedents (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11)
5. a balance between individual liberty and the need for investigation is essential in bail considerations. (Para 42)
6. political vendetta cannot solely invalidate legitimate criminal prosecutions backed by evidence. (Para 55 , 57)
7. anticipatory bail is granted when the case is politically charged yet lacking substantial prima facie support. (Para 71)
8. granting of anticipatory bail (Para 73 , 74)

JUDGMENT

1. This petitioner/A.1 has filed the present Criminal Petition invoking the provisions of Sec. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) seeking pre-arrest bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.16 of 2022, registered at the C.I.D., Police Station, Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, Mangalagiri.

2. The Petitioner, along with others, stands accused in a case involving the offences punishable under Ss. 120(B), 420, 34, 35, 36, 37, 166, 167 and 217 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top