SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Ravi Khandelwal – Appellant
Versus
Taluka Stores – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
1. Leave granted.
Procedural History:
2. The respondent is the tenant of a shop situated at Plot E-2, Kamani Mansion, Paanch Batti, MI Road, Jaipur, with the appellant as the landlord. The appellant purchased the property from its erstwhile owner, M/s Jaipur Metal Electric Co. on 30.01.1985. At the time, the tenanted premises were already under the tenancy of the respondent.
3. The appellant filed a suit for eviction on grounds of bona fide necessity before the Additional Civil Judge-I, Jaipur, on 21.05.1985. The suit was dismissed on 30.10.2002, inter-alia, on a finding that the plaint was not laid in accordance with Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) which proscribed the filing of a suit for eviction within five years from the date on which the premises were let out to the tenant. The Trial Court found that the premises were leased only on 08.06.1982 by the predecessor in interest of the appellant.
4. The appellant thereafter succeeded in the first appeal before the Additional District Judge, Jaipur, in terms of the judgment dated 18.03.2004. This was based on a
Ashok Kumar vs. Suresh Chand and Others
Late Mahadev and Others vs. Babu Lal and Others
M/s. Vadhumal Kanhaiyalal and Others vs. Hemchand and Others
B. Banerjee vs. Smt. Anita Pan
Martin and Harris Ltd. vs. VIth Additional District Judge and Others
Vithalbhai (P) Ltd. vs. Union Bank of India
R. Rajagopal Reddy (Dead) by LRs. and Others vs. Padmini Chandrasekharan (Dead) by LRs.
Kahtoon Begum (Deceased) through LRs. vs. Bhagwan Das and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.