SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1314

A. V. SESHA SAI, SUMATHI JAGADAM
Shaik Masthan Vali – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
G.Suryam, Advocate, Sreedhar Valiveti, Advocate

JUDGMENT

A.V.SESHA SAI, J. - Heard Sri S.M.Subhani, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri G.Suryam and Sri Sreedhar Valiveti, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2 to 4, apart from perusing the material available on record.

2. For realization of the debt amount from one M/s.V.R.Enterprises, the respondents-bank authorities initiated proceedings under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002(for short The Act") and conducted public auction for the subject land, pursuant to the Intended Sale Notice, dtd. 27/8/2010, issued under Rules 6(2) and 8(6) of the Security Interest(Enforcement) Rules, 2002 framed under the Act. The auction for the subject property was conducted on 8/10/2010, in which the petitioner herein emerged as highest bidder and a sale certificate was also issued by the respondents-bank authorities on 11/11/2010 after the payment of the entire bid amount of Rs.5, 41, 200.00 by the petitioner.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, only an extent of 75 square yards is available out of the total extent of 240 square yards on ground and the rest of the extent is covere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top