SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1316

G. NARENDAR, NYAPATHY VIJAY
State of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Parvathaneni Sivaji – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
G.V.S.Kishore Kumar, Advocate, Chetluri Srinivas, Advocate

JUDGMENT

NYAPATHY VIJAY, J. - The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the Judgment in O.A.No.7068 of 2013 dtd. 1/8/2017, which was allowed.

2. The brief facts of the case leading to the present Writ Petition are as follows and the parties are described as in the Tribunal:- The applicant was appointed as Forest Range Officer and subsequently promoted as Assistant Conservator of Forests. During the period 1/7/1993 to 14/3/1996, the applicant had worked as Divisional Forest Officer, Social Forestry, Kurnool.

3. On 29/11/1999, the applicant was issued Charge Memorandum under A.P.C.C.S (CCA) Rules, 1991 framing certain charges to the effect (i) Applicant did not submit records/information in connection with Circle Officer inspection by Chief Conservator of Forests (JFM) despite clear instructions; ii) Applicant allowed F.R.Os under his control to purchase Polythene Bags, Seedlings Barbed Wire, PVC Pipes, Cement and Stone Monolithic without submitting estimates; iii) Applicant failed to submit fortnightly diaries and log book extracts as prescribed under A.P. Forest Department Code; iv) Applicant failed to submit information about District schemes, Accounts and Vouchers in respect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top