SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1318

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Basina Veera Venkata – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Gangadhar Chamarty, Advocate, Anand Kumar Kochiri, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This petition is filed by the petitioner/complainant under Ss. 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., seeking to direct the 4th respondent/Commissioner of Police to register the crime and investigate as per provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") and adhering the guidelines passed by the Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court.

2. The petitioner/complainant filed a complaint under Sec. 190 r/w. Sec. 156(3) of Cr.P.C. against the respondents 2 and 3 herein before the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada (for short, "learned Magistrate") to direct the 4th respondent/3rdrespondent to register a crime for the offences under Sec. 468, 464 r/w. Sec. 471 IPC, wherein the learned Magistrate has rejected the complaint vide impugned order dtd. 11/5/2023 in C.F. No.1782 of 2023. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner/complainant preferred the present revision.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the 2nd respondent/Sub-Inspector of Police has filed a charge sheet in C.C.No.737 of 2016 pending before the learned IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada ("the trial Court") where the petitioner herein arrayed as an accused and this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top