SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1250

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Pitta Daniel Rathna Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
G.V.Shivaji, Advocate

JUDGMENT

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J. - This Criminal Revision Case is preferred by Revisionist against the impugned judgments of conviction and sentence passed against the him in C.C.No.148/1994 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Chinthalapudi, dtd. 8/10/2002, [Hereinafter 'trial court'] confirmed in Criminal Appeal No.162/2002 on the file of V Additional Sessions Judge, West Godavari, dtd. 7/3/2006.[Hereinafter 'Appellate Court']

2. The Revision Petitioner herein was the Accused No.2before the trial Court. The Respondent herein was the Complainant/State, represented by the learned Public Prosecutor. For sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as arrayed before the trial Court.

3. Case of prosecution in nutshell, is that,

a. A Sericulture Unit was started at Makkenavari Gudem, to develop sericulture activities among the tribals. Accused No.2 was the Manager of Godavari Grameena Bank, Makkenavari Gudem, which extended loans for the said purpose, sponsored by Andhra Bank. Accused Nos., 2 and 3 identified 18 beneficiaries among the tribal community, to undertake sericulture activities, during February, 1989. As per the scheme, each beneficiary wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top