Back
K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Broadcom Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Txasldpc Inc. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The present petition is filed under Sec. 78 read with Order XXVI Rules 19 to 22 and Sec. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking the following prayer:
"a) to appoint a Commissioner to address respondent No.2 for collection of evidence, documents as well as for obtaining and recording testimony from respondent No.2 in terms of Letter of Request of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware;
(b) to direct the Commissioner to execute the Commission in terms of the Letter of Request by requiring the written deposition and collection of evidence, documents mentioned in Exhibits A, B and 3 of the Notice of Subpoena accompanying the Letter of Request from respondent No.2 as expeditiously as possible;
c) to direct the Commissioner to direct to execute the abovementioned actions in paragraph (b) in the presence of the advocates of the petitioners in India and the attorneys of the petitioners before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware;
(d) to allow the advocates of the petitioners in India the opportunity to examine or cross-examine respondent No.2;
(e) to allow the attorneys of the petitioners before the United States Di
The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of India to extend cooperation in civil litigations and comply with directions from foreign countries, as per the provisions of t....
Chapter X-A of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1967 was not merely a proviso or an exception to Order 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that the Court could exercise power under this ....
The court established that additional evidence cannot be admitted in appellate proceedings if the party had prior opportunities to present it, and that the appointment of a commissioner should not be....
The court clarified that the appointment of a Commissioner for local inspection in encroachment cases is permissible even before trial, reinforcing the report as vital evidence.
The court established that the appointment of a commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC is not to be used as a means to collect evidence after the closure of proceedings, and such application....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
