SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 208

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. Ravindra Babu, J.
Pulla Obulapathi & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Appeal Nos. 834 and 807 of 2007
Decided On : 27-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, Senior Counsel, Rep. M/s. V. Disha Chowdary, Counsel for the Appellants; Sri Naidana Sravan Kumar, Special Assistant, Rep. Learned Public Prosecutor, Counsel for the Respondent.

The court emphasized the necessity of corroborating witness testimonies with medical evidence and recognized the spontaneous nature of the incident in determining culpability.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 148, 304 Part-II, 324 R/w.149 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 235(2) - Conviction for rioting and culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Accused found guilty of unlawful assembly and causing injuries during a festival celebration - The trial court's findings on charges under Sections 147 and 307 IPC were not upheld - The court modified sentences based on the nature of the incident being spontaneous rather than premeditated. (Paras 1, 52, 54)

(B) Criminal Appeals - Scope of review - The appellate court must reassess the evidence and determine if the trial court's findings were supported by the evidence on record - The court found inconsistencies in witness testimonies and medical evidence, leading to partial acquittals and modifications of sentences. (Paras 50, 51)

Facts of the case:
The case arose from a violent incident during Ugadi festival celebrations where the accused formed an unlawful assembly and attacked the complainant and his father, resulting in the father's death. The prosecution alleged that the accused acted with a common object to cause harm. (Paras 4, 20)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the conviction of A-1 for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and A-2 for causing injuries, while acquitting others due to lack of evidence. The sentences were modified to reflect the spontaneous nature of the incident. (Paras 54, 56)

Issues: The main issues included whether the accused formed an unlawful assembly, whether they acted with a common object, and the sustainability of the trial court's judgment. (Paras 16)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for corroboration of witness testimonies with medical evidence and the importance of assessing the spontaneity of the incident in determining culpability. (Paras 50, 52)

Result: Criminal Appeal No.834 of 2007 is allowed in part; Criminal Appeal No.807 of 2007 is allowed in part. (Paras 56)

COMMON JUDGMENT

A.V. Ravindra Babu, J. - Challenge in Criminal Appeal No.834 of 2007 is to the judgment, dated 29.06.2007, in Sessions Case No.30 of 2006 on the file of the Court of V Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Anantapur (for short, 'the learned Additional Sessions Judge'), whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge found the appellants herein, who were the accused Nos.1, 3, 4 and 8 in S.C. No.30 of 2006 along with other accused guilty of the charge under Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, 'the IPC') and charge under Section 304 Part-II IPC R/w.149 IPC, convicted them under Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Cr.P.C') and, after questioning them about the quantum of sentence, sentenced them to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for one year each and to pay a fine of Rs.200/- each in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for one month each for the offence under Section 148 IPC and further sentenced them to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years each and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for two months each for the offence under Section 304 Part-II IPC R/w.149 IPC.

2. Challenge in Criminal Appeal No.807 of 2007 is to the judgment, dated 29.06.2007, in Sessions Case No.30 of 2006 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge found the appellants herein, who were the accused Nos.2, 5, 6, 7 and 10 in S.C. No.30 of 2006, along with other accused guilty of the charge under Section 148 of the IPC and Section 324 R/w.149 IPC for causing injuries to PW.1 and PW.2, as the case may be, sentenced them to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for one year each and to pay a fine of Rs.200/- each in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for one month each for the offence under Section 148 IPC and further sentenced them to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for one year each and to pay a fine of Rs.200/- each in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for one month each for the offence under Section 324 R/w.149 IPC.

3. The parties to these Criminal Appeals will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial court, for the sake of convenience.

4. Sessions Case No.30 of 2006 arose out of the committal order in Preliminary Registration Case (PRC) No.27 of 2005 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Anantapur (for short, 'the learned Magistrate') pertaining to Crime No.40 of 2004 of Bukkarayasamudram Police Station, Anantapur District for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 324, 307 and 302 R/w.149 IPC.

5. The State, represented by the Inspector of Police, Itikalapalli Circle, filed charge sheet against the accused alleging the aforesaid offences. The case of the prosecution, in brief, according to the contents of the charge sheet, is that on 21.03.2004 evening Ugadi festival was being celebrated in K.K. Agraharam village and as a part of celebration there was competition of pulling of big stone pillars by bullocks. When the bullocks of Kapu community were pulling the stone pillar, all heckled at the feats and passed derogatory remarks. LW.1 - Kuruba Kalaguri Pakkirappa took exception for the bad language used against Kapu community. Then, one Surappa and Narappa belonging to Kapu community were assaulted. Thereafter, the matter was subsided. Kaluguri Veera Narappa, who was arrayed as A-11 in the charge sheet, took it as an insult and felt that because of LW.1, he was assaulted and wanted to teach a lesson to him. On 22.03.2004 at about 01:00 p.m. when LW.1 was sitting on a pial by the side of Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, A-11 collected A-1 to A-10 and all of them formed themselves into members of an unlawful assembly with the common object of attacking LW.1 and, in pursuance of the said common object, accused armed with sticks, came and dragged LW.1 from the pial and threw him down in front of Sanjamma's house. A-5, A-6 and A-7 hit LW.1 with sticks on his body, due

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top