Back
G. NARENDAR, NYAPATHY VIJAY
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Arugollu Durga Prasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.Narendar, J.
Heard Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar, learned Government Pleader for Services-I (“Ld. G.P. for S-I”) appearing for the Appellants and Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned Counsel for the Respondents/Writ Petitioners.
2. The Appellants are the State represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home; the State Level Police Recruitment Board represented by its Chairman, and the Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh.
3. The Appellants are before this Court in this intra-Court Appeal being aggrieved by the order, dated 17.11.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge, on I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.P.No.29757 of 2023.
4. The Respondents 1 to 24 are the Petitioners and candidates, who have participated in the recruitment process initiated by the Appellants, more particularly, the 2nd Appellant, to fill-up the posts of Stipendiary Cadet Trainee (SCT) Sub-Inspectors of Police (Civil) (Men and Women) in Police Department and also to fill-up similar posts in the Reserve Police.
5. The parties are referred to by their nomenclature before the learned Single Judge for the purpose of brevity and convenience.
6. The case of the Petitioners in a nutshell is that they are aspirants and
A candidate who participates in a selection process wherein the eligibility criteria as well as the criteria for selection are disclosed beforehand cannot, upon being unsuccessful, turn around and co....
Candidates are bound by the terms of the advertisement and the standing order, and cannot challenge the selection process after participating in it.
The court upheld the recruitment process's integrity, reaffirming that the medical examination procedures aligned with due process and disallowed the re-medical requests based on delayed objections b....
Candidates are bound by the terms of the advertisement and the standing order, and they cannot challenge the selection process after participating in it. The competent authorities have the discretion....
The judgment establishes the principle that candidates are entitled to accurate and fair physical assessments in recruitment processes, and that respondents must provide clear information on relaxati....
A recruitment process must maintain objective standards; mere allegations of bias without evidence do not invalidate selection outcomes, particularly when procedural integrity is upheld.
The court upheld the finality of height measurement and related recruitment procedures governed by regulations, dismissing claims for re-evaluation due to marginal discrepancies.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
