Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Bumbathula Sravan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Telangana Public Service Commission, Rep. By Its Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aparesh Kumar Singh, CJ.
Mr. Goda Siva, learned Senior Counsel represents Mr. B.Arjun, learned counsel for appellants in W.A.No.18 of 2025.
Mr. G.Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel represents Mr. Sai Prasen Gundavaram, learned counsel for appellant in W.A.No.74 of 2025 and respondent No.14 in W.A.No.106 of 2025.
Mr. T.Surya Karan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel represents Mr. Gouraram Rajashekar Reddy, learned counsel for appellant in W.A.No.106 of 2025.
Mr. P.S.Rajasekhar, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana Public Service Commission appears for appellant in W.A.No.167 of 2025 and respondent No.1 in W.A.Nos.18, 74 and 106 of 2025.
Mr. J.Sudheer, learned counsel appears for respondent Nos.6 to 14 in W.A.Nos.18 and 74 of 2025; respondent Nos.1 to 9 in W.A.No.167 of 2025.
Mr. U.Santosh Kumar, learned counsel appears for respondent No.11 in W.A.No.106 of 2025.
Ms. M.Shalini, learned Government Pleader for Services-II appears for respondent No.2 in W.A.Nos.18, 74 and 106 of 2025 and respondent No.10 in W.A.No.167 of 2025.
2. All the writ appeals are directed against the order dated 20.12.2024 in W.P.No.28639 of 2024 passed by the learned writ court. Therefore, all the writ appeals
The court upheld the recruitment process's integrity, reaffirming that the medical examination procedures aligned with due process and disallowed the re-medical requests based on delayed objections b....
Judicial intervention in recruitment medical assessments is restricted; decisions by Medical Boards are upheld unless there's clear evidence of procedural violations or substantive discrepancies.
Conflicting medical fitness opinions from government hospitals entitle merit-selected candidate to fresh independent re-examination, despite initial and review unfitness, without impugning medical bo....
Conflicting medical opinions from review board at same hospital (within days) and subsequent independent government hospital warrant fresh medical examination by different board for fairness to provi....
Judicial review of medical examination decisions in recruitment is limited to procedural adherence and significant discrepancies, with higher fitness standards for disciplined forces.
Fresh independent medical exam ordered when initial and review by same hospital yield conflicting govt hospital opinion.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
