SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 406

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
Chunduru Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
G. Dhubagunta Dhanalakshmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : CHALLA AJAY KUMAR
For the Respondent: JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO

ORDER :

The challenge in this CRP is to the order in I.A.No.50 of 2024 in O.S.No.852/2016 passed by the II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Vijayawada dismissing the petition filed by the petitioners/defendant Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5 U/s 151 C.P.C to reopen the matter for cross-examination of PW.3.

2. The trial Court dismissed the petition on the main ground that earlier when the matter was posted for cross-examination of PW.3 on 07.11.2023, the defendants did not cross-examine official witness and hence their cross-examination was recorded as nil and thereafter the petitioners did not file any petition to re-open and re-call PW.3 immediately but they filed IAs belatedly only to protract the matter and suit is of the year 2016 and therefore there were no bona fides in the petition. 3. Heard arguments of learned counsel for petitioner Sri Challa Ajay Kumar and learned counsel for respondents Sri Josyula Bhaskara Rao. 4. It is seen that O.S.No.852/2016 was filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction in respect of plaint schedule property which is said to be asbestos roofed shed in an extent of 3199.80 Sq. Yds. of site situated within the limits of Vijayawada Municipal Corpor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top