Back
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
K. Mahesh Kumar Reddy, S/O. P. Venkaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Prl. Secretary, Forest Department – Respondent
ORDER :
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.
1. Heard Sri Keerthi Kiran Kota, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri D. Khasim Saheb, learned Government Pleader for Forests.
2. Prayer made in the Writ Petition is as under:
FACTS AS SET OUT BY THE WRIT PETITIONER:-
3. The case of the Writ Petitioner is that in the year 2006, he had applied for a quarry lease for mining black granite over an extent of 5
The court established that prior judicial findings and inspections must be respected, and any new claims of violations require proper notice and participation of the affected parties.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the potential impact of quarrying on the surrounding ecosystem and wildlife, as well as the existence of an alternate remedy under Rule 36-C. The de....
Criminal proceedings against a Managing Partner without the Firm being accused lack specific allegations and cannot establish vicarious liability under penal law.
The court emphasized the importance of proper consideration, adherence to principles of natural justice, and compliance with Section 77 of the Mines Act, 1952 in matters related to quarry leases and ....
The court affirmed that the disputed mining area is classified as Revenue land, not Reserve Forest, necessitating a joint survey to resolve land classification disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
