V. Satyanarayna Murthy vs State Of Andhra Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(AP) 445

K. MANMADHA RAO
V. Satyanarayna Murthy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Krishna Rao M.
For the Respondents: K. Swarna Seshu.

ORDER :

(K. Manmadha Rao, J.) :

The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief :

“…..to issue issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in all implement the Orders dt 20.07.2018 IN P.A.No.1106/2018 inspite of the 3rd respondent issued the in Rc No 3132/A2/2018, dt 21.08.2018, as illegal, arnitrary, violation of article 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner wife i.e. Smt. Sudhistnamma in the pension proposals Application of Family member Column and to forward the same to the 5th respondent by taking into consideration of the in RC No 3132/A2/2018, dt21.08.2018 and pass…….”

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner had working as a Junior Assistant in the 4threspondent school and he was retired from service on 30.11.2011. The petitioner’s wife name was not included in the pension form by the 4th respondent, who in turn, forwarded the same to the 5th respondent. The petitioner’s 2nd wife, namely, Sudhistnamma has sent her name and her 3 children names for i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document