SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 569

B SYAMSUNDER
Repana Anjaneyulu @ Ramanjulu – Appellant
Versus
Tadipatri Sireesha @ Lasyasree – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Y Balaji
For the Respondent: O Udaya Kumar

ORDER :

B Syamsunder, J.

I have heard both sides.

2. As both petitions are between the same parties with similar relief, can be disposed of by Common Order.

3. These Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed by the petitioner/husband, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short “CPC”). The Tr.CMP No.257 of 2023 is filed, seeking transfer of HMOP No.96 of 2023 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Madanapalle of Chittoor Judicial District to Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Rayachoty of YSR Kadapa Judicial District, and Tr.CMP No.262 of 2023 is filed, seeking transfer of FCOP No.141 of 2022 on the file of Family Court, Tirupati to I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Rayachoty of YSR Kadapa Judicial District.

4. In both petitions, the contention of the petitioner is that he filed HMOP No.96 of 2023 before Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Madanapalle of Chittoor Judicial District, seeking for divorce when he was working as Government teacher in Chittoor District and was staying at Madanapalle town, and now he has been transferred to Kadapa Judicial District, presently Annamayya District, and residing at Rayachoty town. It is the contentio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top