RAVI NATH TILHARI, NYAPATHY VIJAY
M. Rama Devi – Appellant
Versus
K. Srinivasulu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.) :
Heard Sri Lakshmikanth Reddy, learned counsel for the claimants and Sri Naresh Byrapaneni, learned counsel for the United Insurance Company Limited represented by its Divisional Manager, Kurnool in both the appeals.
2. No representation for the owner, one of the respondents in the appeals.
3. The M.A.C.M.A.No.793 of 2017 has been filed by the claimants for enhancement of the compensation amount as awarded.
4. M.A.C.M.A.No.1184 of 2017 has been filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited challenging the same award dated 07.09.2016 passed in M.V.O.P.No.478 of 2014 by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Additional District Judge, Kurnool (in short, ‘the Tribunal’). The appeals are filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1994 (in short, ‘the M.V. Act’).
5. The claimants filed the claim petition under Section 166of the M.V. Act claiming compensation of Rs.1,25,00,000/- for the death of Mr.M.Ravi Kumar in a motor accident dated 06.05.2014 at Obulapuram Mitta in Dhone Mandal. The claimant no.1 is a widow, claimant nos.2 and
New India Assurance Company Limited vs. Mandar Madhav Tambe and Others
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Swaran Singh and others
Narcinva V. Kamat v. Alfredo Antonio Doe Martins
National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi
K. Ramya v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
A learner's license does not preclude insurance liability if the driver is accompanied by a licensed instructor, and the insurer must prove policy violations to avoid liability.
A learner's licence is valid under the Motor Vehicles Act, and the Insurance Company failed to prove breach of policy conditions, leading to a revised compensation amount.
The court ruled that the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation first, despite the driver's invalid license, and established guidelines for calculating future prospects and multipliers in co....
A valid light motor vehicle license includes transport vehicles, and insurers cannot deny liability without proving negligence by the vehicle owner.
The court affirmed the validity of the driver's license and ruled that the Insurance Company failed to prove negligence, thus holding it liable for compensation.
The insurer must prove a breach of policy conditions by the insured to avoid liability; mere invalidity of a driving license does not absolve the insurer from responsibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.