SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1407

RAVI NATH TILHARI, NYAPATHY VIJAY
Komisetty Padmalatha – Appellant
Versus
N. Sreenivasulu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri Sri Dr.P.B. Vijay Kumar
For the Respondent: Smt A. Jayanthi, S.C.

JUDGMENT:

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.

1. Heard Dr. P.B. Vijay Kumar, learned senior counsel, assisted by Sri K.R.S. Prakash Rao, learned counsel for the appellants and Smt A. Jayanthi, learned standing counsel for the 2 nd respondent-the New India Assurance Company Limited.

2. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, “the M.V Act”) was filed by the claimantsappellants, challenging the award dated 03.10.2011, in M.V.O.P. No.582 of 2007, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunalcum-Principal District Judge, Kadapa (in short, “the Tribunal”).

3. The Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition of the appellants-claimants for an amount of Rs.21,83,840/- with interest thereon @ 6% p.a against the 1st respondent-owner of the offending vehicle but dismissing the same against the New India Assurance Company Limited-2 nd respondent.

4. The facts briefly stated are that the deceased Bandaru Sreeram Lakshmi Radha Krishna, of whom the appellants are the 4 legal representatives, died in a road accident which occurred on 24.08.2007 at about 6.30 p.m, while he was coming on motorcycle, when TATA Sumo Jeep bearing No.AP 03-U-4182 coming from the opposite direction at high sp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top