K. MANMADHA RAO
Kishore Granites Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
(K. Manmadha Rao, J.) :
The Writ Petition No.29056 of 2021 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief :
The Writ Petition No.28142 of 2021 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
2. Since the petitioner, facts and issues involved in both the writ petitions are one and the same, this Court find it expedient to decide these ma
All Bengal Excise Licensees Association Vs. Raghabendra Singh & Ors
Anirudhsinhji Karansinhi Jadeja and another v. State of Gujarat
Commissioner of Police v. Gordhandas
Devinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others
K.I. Shephard and Others v. Union of India and Others (1987) 4 SCC 431: AIR 1988 SC 686
Kalari Nagabhushana Rao v. The Collector, Panchayat Wing, Guntur and Ors
Manohar Lal (dead) by Lrs v. Ugrasen (dead) by Lrs. And others
Mulraj Vs. Murti Raghunathji Maharaj
Rajaram Jaiswal v Collector (District Magistrate) Allahabad and another
Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. D.C.I.T. & Ors. 2006 (11) SCALE 409
Ram and Shyam Company v. State of Haryana and others
Seimens Ltd. V. State of Maharashtra and others
Shri Shekhar Ghosh v. Union of India & Anr. 2006 (11) SCALE 363
Special Director and Another v. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse and Another
State of Punjab and another v Gurdial Singh and others
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahm Datt Sharma and Anr. AIR 1987 SC 943
Union of India and Another v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana
V.C. Banaras Hindu University and Ors. v. Shrikant
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and others
Pre-determined issuance of demand notices violates legal principles requiring fair process, rendering them null and void.
Writ petitions can be maintained against show cause notices if they demonstrate pre-determined conclusions by the authority, constituting a legal mala fide exercise of power.
Writs under Article 226 can be maintained against predetermination by authorities, regardless of alternative remedies available, invalidating actions based on extraneous influences.
Statutory authorities must exercise powers independently, and actions based on predetermination or external influence are deemed illegal.
Point of law: Rule 26(1) of APMMC Rules 1966, Rule 12(5)(h)(iii) of APMMC, 1966 for having excavated and transported 749 cum of Colour Granite without payment of seigniorage fee in contravention to c....
Point of law: Rule 20 of the Rules of 1966 provides that subject to a contract to the contrary, a quarry lease granted under the rules shall confer on the lessee, the right to quarry, carry away, sel....
For the purpose of Rule 35-A, if the Government feels that the orders passed by the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, on 16.10.2018 were not in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the D....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.