Back
TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
Gudimetla Damodar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief/s:
2. The present Writ Petition is filed to set aside the order dated 05.02.2020 in I.A. No.1 of 2019 in Claim No.49 of 2018-19, on the file of the Deputy Registrar/Officer on Special Duty, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, West Godavari District, Eluru, wherein whereby the 3rd respondent has dismissed the aforesaid I.A. filed to implead the proposed respondents therein as respondent Nos.8 to 12 to the claim suit enquiry.
3. At the outset, it is the case of the petitioners herein that the 4threspondent bank filed claim No.49/2018-2019 on the file of th
The court established that the inclusion of necessary parties is essential for justice, and the arbitrator must utilize their powers to summon witnesses in cases involving allegations of fraud.
Failure to apply for defense in a summary suit under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act results in acceptance of the claims made by the plaintiff.
Court emphasized the necessity of providing essential loan documents to parties to uphold principles of natural justice, ruling that impugned orders issued without such provision are invalid.
Section 84 which falls under Chapter IX “Settlement of Disputes” of the Act, 2002 refers to reference of the disputes by the Central Registrar, Cooperative Societies with regard to the disputes touch....
The court established that under the MCS Act, the issuance of recovery certificates involves a summary inquiry focused on the quantification of arrears, and that disputes requiring evidence must be a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
