Back
B. KRISHNA MOHAN
Nathani Durga Rao, S/o. Kishanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Since the subject matter in these writ petitions is one and the same, these matters were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
1. The facts of the cases are that the petitioners in these writ petitions viz., W.P.Nos.22212, 19707, 19866 and 22135 of 2020 are the absolute owners, possessors and enjoyers of agricultural lands admeasuring Ac.0-50 cents out of Ac.2-00 cents each covered by R.S.No.127/P of Nuzvid village and Mandal in Krishna District, having purchased the same for valid considerations from their vendor Chinta Gopala Rao under registered sale deeds respectively. It is further submitted that the vendor of the petitioners Chinta Gopala Rao purchased Ac.2-00 in Survey No.127/P for a valid consideration from his vendor Inuganti Narasimha Rao under a registered sale deed dated 28.03.1985 in Doc.No.744/1985.
The facts of the case in W.P.No.22886 of 2020 are that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are the absolute owners and possessors of land to an extent of Ac.0-50 cents in R.S.No.127/P of Nuzvid each having purchased the same for a valid consideration from one Sri Dannapaneni Madhu, S/o.D.Mohana Rao under a registered sale deed bearing document Nos.732/
Revenue authorities lack jurisdiction to resolve title disputes over land, which must be adjudicated in civil court.
Claims for land ownership after significant delays must be addressed by civil courts, as administrative bodies cannot adjudicate on disputed titles without violating established rights.
Jurisdiction of revenue authorities to issue mutation orders upheld when confirmed ownership certificates exist, superseding prior claims based on disputed titles.
Civil suits can challenge revenue authority orders if they violate principles of natural justice. Failure to notify affected parties renders such orders void.
Revenue authorities are obligated to dispose of applications for mutation of land records within the prescribed time frame as per the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act and Rul....
The main legal point established is that the absence of permission and validation under the A.P. (T.A.) Tenancy and Agriculture Land Act 1950 renders a sale transaction void and unlawful.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
