SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 696

SUREPALLI NANDA
Buddolu Veeresh – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N.Naveen Kumar, Advocate, P.Prakash Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Heard the Learned Senior Counsel Mr. B.Prakash Reddy appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.1, and Sri K.Venkata Narsimha Reddy, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.1.

2. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of certiorari and call for records relating to proceedings in File No. B/3088/09 dtd. 18/1/2010 confirming the orders passed in proceedings in File No. B/4140/2005 dtd. 30/1/2008 issued by respondent No. 1 and quash the same.

3. The case of the Petitioner, in brief, is as follows:

a) The petitioners' father late Buddolu Gopal was the owner and pattadar of land admeasuring Ac.25-18 gts. in S.No. 775 and 776 of Nednoor Village, Kandukur Mandal, R.R.District having acquired the same by way of family settlement among his brothers and pattadar passbook and title deed books were issued by the 1st Respondent with respect to the same.

b) The petitioners' father was in service in railways and thus, taking advantage of the absence of the petitioners' father, the 2nd Respondent created a private sale deed in respect of subject land alleged to have been executed by B. V

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top