Back
K SREENIVASA REDDY
Srikurthy Manohar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
K. Sreenivasa Reddy, J.
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 and 6, seeking to quash the proceedings in SC.SPL.No.19 of 2017 on the file of learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District for the offences punishable under Sections 323 read with 34 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SCs & the STs (PoA) Act, 1989.
2. It is represented that the parties have settled the dispute amicably out of the Court at the intervention of their elders and well wishers. In view of the settlement arrived between the parties, they filed IA Nos.2 of 2024 and 3 of 2024 seeking to permit them to compound the offences and to record the compromise.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioners and 2nd respondent herein are present before this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for 2nd respondent have identified the parties in the open Court. They produced their respective aadhar cards in proof of their identity. This Court has questioned the de facto complainant with regard to compromise and he has categorically stated to that extent that he has voluntarily entered into comp
The court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if a voluntary compromise is reached and the likelihood of conviction is deemed remote.
Proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in cases of serious offences when a settlement is reached, provided the likelihood of conviction is minimal and supports the harmonious relationsh....
The court may quash proceedings for serious offences if a voluntary compromise exists and the likelihood of conviction is remote, promoting harmony between parties.
The court has the power to quash proceedings even in cases involving heinous and serious offences, considering factors such as the stage of the proceedings, the possibility of conviction, and the imp....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings if a compromise is reached, provided the nature of the crime allows for such action and the possibility of conviction is deemed remote.
Parties can compound offences for serious crimes like rape under unique circumstances, enabling courts to quash proceedings when further prosecution serves no purpose and the victim expresses a desir....
The court may quash proceedings in heinous crimes if evidence shows remote chances of conviction and both parties consent to compromise.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 where parties have settled their dispute amicably, especially in cases with remote chances of conviction.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings when parties have settled amicably, provided the nature of the offence allows for compounding and continuation would constitute an abuse of the court pro....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
