IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Udatha Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
1. This Criminal Petition, under Section 4 82 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners/A-1 to A-3, seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.727 of 2023 of Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada City, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 4 98-A, 509 IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 3 (1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. It is represented that both the parties have settled the dispute amicably out of the Court at the intervention of their elders and well wishers. In view of the settlement arrived between both the parties, they filed IA Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 seeking to permit them to compound the offences and to record the compromise.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioners and 2nd respondent herein are present before this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for 2nd respondent have identified both the parties in the open Court. This Court has questioned the de facto complainant with regard to compromise and she has categorically stated to that extent that she has voluntarily entered into compromise with the accused.
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & another
Ramawatar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 where parties have settled their dispute amicably, especially in cases with remote chances of conviction.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings if a compromise is reached, provided the nature of the crime allows for such action and the possibility of conviction is deemed remote.
Proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in cases of serious offences when a settlement is reached, provided the likelihood of conviction is minimal and supports the harmonious relationsh....
The court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if a voluntary compromise is reached and the likelihood of conviction is deemed remote.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings when parties have settled amicably, provided the nature of the offence allows for compounding and continuation would constitute an abuse of the court pro....
The court may quash proceedings for serious offences if a voluntary compromise exists and the likelihood of conviction is remote, promoting harmony between parties.
Parties can compound offences for serious crimes like rape under unique circumstances, enabling courts to quash proceedings when further prosecution serves no purpose and the victim expresses a desir....
The court has the power to quash proceedings even in cases involving heinous and serious offences, considering factors such as the stage of the proceedings, the possibility of conviction, and the imp....
The court may quash proceedings in heinous crimes if evidence shows remote chances of conviction and both parties consent to compromise.
Compromise in non-compoundable matrimonial offences can be accepted to prevent injustice if the parties resolve their disputes, considering the nature of the offences.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.