K. SURESH REDDY, B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Kowju Ravi Naga Babu @ Nagababu – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi, J.
1. The accused No.1 and 2 in Sessions Case No.163/2014 on the file of learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari at Tanuku, filed Criminal Appeal No.715/2016, whereas the accused No.3 in the above Sessions Case filed Criminal Appeal No.1327/2017. Both the appeals filed assailing the judgment dated 27.06.2016 delivered in the above Sessions Case, where under the learned Sessions Judge convicted the appellants/A-1 to A-3 for the offence U/s.460 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘I.P.C’) and sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months each.
2. Pending appeal, the accused No.1 died on 03.06.2024. Therefore, this Court as per order dated 20.06.2024 dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant/A-1, as abated. Hence, the Criminal Appeal No.715/2016 filed by A-2 and the Appeal No.1327/2017 filed by A-3 were heard, considered, and disposed of by this common judgment.
3. The gravamen of the charge is that the accused No.1 to 3 on the intervening night of 10/11.11.2012 committed lurking house trespass by night,
Ashish Jain Vs. Makrand Singh and others
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Circumstantial evidence must be corroborated and form a complete chain to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases.
Extrajudicial confessions are weak evidence and require corroboration; reliance on them must be cautious and supported by credible evidence.
Extrajudicial confessions require corroboration and cannot solely establish guilt without reliable evidence.
The judgment emphasizes the requirement for complete and unimpeachable evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a case of circumstantial evidence.
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, and extrajudicial confessions require corroboration to be reliable.
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, and extrajudicial confessions require corroboration to be credible.
The prosecution must establish each and every link of the circumstances relied upon in a case based on circumstantial evidence to prove the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbroken chain of evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The convicting based solely on circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confessions requires corroborative proof and must adhere to well-established principles regarding such evidence.
In order to sustain conviction must be complete and incapable of explanation of any other hypothesis than that of the guilt of the accused and such evidence should not only be consistent with the gui....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.