Back
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Pydah Subramanya Jagannadha Satya Prasad S/o. Late Sri Rama Krishna Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Pyda Sathiraju, S/o. Late Pyda Nookaraju – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's ancestral claim to land. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendants' claim of title to land. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's rationale on parties' arguments. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. need for proper identification of land. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's interpretation on title in injunction cases. (Para 37 , 40 , 41) |
| 6. evaluation of discrepancies in plaintiffs' claims. (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 7. recognition and implications of rough patta. (Para 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 8. correct burden of proof in possession cases. (Para 79 , 80 , 81) |
| 9. court's inherent power for restitution. (Para 93 , 94 , 95 , 96) |
| 10. final ruling ordering restitution of land. (Para 106 , 107) |
ORDER
R. Raghunandan Rao, J.
This is an appeal, by the defendants in the suit, against the judgement and decree dt.22.02.2008 in O.S.No.8 of 2007, in the Court of IV Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Kakinada.
2. The parties in this appeal are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit.
3. The case of the plaintiffs is that, the 1st Plaintiff's father Late Sri Pyda Nookaraju had been given Ac.20.00 cents of land by the Maharaja of Pithapuram, on account of his services to the said Maharaja, in old survey No.157/2 and 157/4
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
