SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1531

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Pothala Venkata Ramana S/o Gowribabu – Appellant
Versus
P. Subbi Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri G.Rama Gopal
For the Respondents: Sri N.Rama Krishna

JUDGMENT :

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred under Section 30(1) of Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (in short ‘The Act’) against the impugned order dated 19.08.1997 in W.C. No.98 of 1996 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Visakhapatnam (herein after be referred to as “Commissioner”).

2. The appellant herein was the claimant and respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein were the Opposite Parties before the learned Commissioner.

For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as they arrayed before the learned Commissioner.

3. The case of the appellant in brief is that;

The claimant who is the injured filed the petition before the learned Commissioner seeking compensation of Rs.1,00,000/-stating that, he worked as driver for the lorry bearing No.AHQ 8469 under Opposite Party No.1 and on 17.08.1995, while he was discharging his duty as a driver and when the lorry reached at Kinthali at Etcherla, Srikakulam, due to the collusion of lorry with a van going from opposite direction with a high speed, it dashed the lorry. In the accident, he sustained injuries to his both legs. Soon after the accident, he was shifted to Srikakulam Government Hosp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top