SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1302

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Undralla Chinna Rao – Appellant
Versus
N. Babu Rao – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
D.Praveen Kumar, Advocate, Challa Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred under Sec. 30 of Workmen"s Compensation Act, 1923 (in short The Act") against the impugned order dtd. 24/1/2006 in W.C. No.94 of 2004 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen"s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Vijayawada (hereinafter be referred to as "the Commissioner").

2. The Appellant herein was the Applicant. The respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein were the Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2 before the learned Commissioner.For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as arrayed before the learned Commissioner.

3. The case of the appellant in brief is that: The Applicant worked as a lorry driver under opposite party No.1. On 2/8/2003. While he was travelling from Madras to Visakhapatnam, when the vehicle reached Gokul Krishna Engineering College gate, he met with an accident and sustained grievous injuries to his right leg, resulting in permanent disability. He took treatment at Government Hospital, Sullurpet. The Police registered it as Cr.No.67/2003. Thereafter, he took treatment at Government Hospital, Vijayawada, and he underwent surgery and a steel rod was inserted. As the accident o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top