Back
RAVI NATH TILHARI
Karri Malakondaiah, S/o Polaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. ,rp. by its PrI Secretary, Department of Municipal and Administration – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.
This matter has been listed under the caption of “Specially Identified Cases” and pertains to the year 2017.
2. On 21.04.2023, the following order was passed:-
3. Today there is no representation.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for “want of prosecution”.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
Dismissal of writ petition for non-prosecution.
Judicial proceedings must ensure that all relevant applications are addressed before execution to uphold the principles of justice and fair trial.
Procedural rules must favor justice, allowing parties to present their case despite missed timelines if sufficient cause for absence is shown, per Order IX Rule 7 CPC.
Dismissal of writ petition for non-prosecution due to repeated non-appearance.
The court established that 'sufficient cause' for non-appearance must be interpreted liberally, allowing for restoration of applications even after previous dismissals.
The relevance and impact of the disposal of the original suit on the revision petition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
