SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1323

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
T.S. Sivagnanam, Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, JJ.
West Bengal Pharmacy Council And Another – Appellants
Versus
Rusha Podder And Others – Respondents
MAT NO. 411 OF 2023 (I.A. NO. CAN 01 & 02 OF 2023)
Decided On : 19-05-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Kishore Datta, Advocate, Mr. Avik Ghatak, Advocate, Mr. Soham Banerjee, Advocate, Mr. Parashar Baidya, Advocate, Mr. Soham De Dhara, Advocate, Mr. Ananta Shaw, Advocate, Mr. Falguni Bandyopadhyay, Advocate, Ms. Sreetama Neogi, Advocate, Ms. Riya Ballav, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Advocate, Ms. Debdooti Dutta, Advocate, Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Karmakar, Advocate, Ms. Gargi Goswami, Advocate.

Headnote:(A) Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Section 19(a) - Rule 5 of the Rules for Election of Members of the West Bengal Pharmacy Council - Challenge against rejection of nomination papers - The rejection of nominations by the council was deemed flawed by the Single Bench, which ordered reconsideration of nominations. The petitioners were denied proper opportunity to object to the rejections as per Rule 5(1). The court affirmed that interference in elections must only occur within established parameters and under exceptional circumstances. (Paras 6, 7, 14, 23, 80)

(B) Election Law - Judicial Review - The High Court is restricted from intervening in election matters post-commencement unless exceptional circumstances justify judicial scrutiny. The procedure under the statute must be adhered to, delaying judicial review until after the election process concludes. (Paras 15, 77, 79)

(C) Eligibility for Contesting Elections - A valid registration is crucial for contesting elections, and the rejection grounds for nominations must align with specified rules. Non-disclosure of rejection grounds challenges eligible candidates' rights. (Paras 8, 10, 23)

(D)

Result: Appeal allowed; the order set aside and the writ petition dismissed. (Paras 81)

JUDGMENT :

T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.

1. This intra court appeal has been filed by the West Bengal Pharmacy Council challenging the correctness of the order passed in WPA No. 509 of 2023 dated 28.02.2023 filed by the respondents 1 to 4 herein. The respondent writ petitioners had filed the writ petition praying for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the appellants/authorities to forthwith grant a hearing of the objections raised by them vide email dated 01.01.2023; to issue a writ of prohibition to restrain the appellant from sending election papers to the electors on January 09, and January 10, 2023 and for issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the notice dated December 20, 2022 by which the appellant council published the list of accepted/rejected candidates for the election to the West Bengal Pharmacy Council.

2. The Learned Single Bench by the impugned order held that the rejection of the nomination of the respondent writ petitioners was flawed and directed the appellant council to reconsider the nominations filed by the writ petitioners in accordance with Rule 5(1) of the Rules for Election of Members including the President and the Vice President of the West Bengal Pharmacy Council and of the Members of the Executive Committee of the said council. The learned writ court further directed that the appellant council will give effect to the final list/notice published on 20.12.2022 only after the direction is complied with. Further it was observed that since the last election of the council was held in 2007 with the tenure of office expired in 2013, no prejudice is caused if the question of the writ petitioner’s candidatures is decided within the time directed. The appellant council being aggrieved by such order have preferred this appeal.

3. Heard Mr. Kishore Dutta, learned senior advocate assisted by Mr. Avik Ghatak, Mr. Soham Banerjee, Mr. Parashar Baidya and Mr. Soham De Dhara, learned advocates for the appellants. Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee assisted by Ms. Debdooti Dutta, learned advocates for the state. Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee assisted by Mr. Rahul Karmakar and Ms. Gargi Goswami learned advocates for the respondent. Mr. Ananta Shaw assisted by Mr. Falguni Bandyopadhyay, Ms. Sreetama Neogi and Ms. Riya Ballav learned advocates for the appellants in CAN No. 02 of 2023.

4. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are as hereunder. The writ petitioners are registered pharmacists under the appellant council having valid registration as on the date when they filed the writ petition. It was stated that 15 members constitute the body of the council and out of the said 15 members, 6 members are elected among the registered pharmacists of the State of West Bengal, 5 members to be nominated by the State of West Bengal of whom 3 must possess prescribed degree or diploma in pharmacy and one member has to be elected from the West Bengal Medical Council and the other three members are ex-officio Chief Administrative Medical Officer, Ex-officio Officer-in-charge, Drugs Control and Ex Officio Government analyst under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, the entire panel of members as specified under Section 19 of the PHARMACY ACT , 1948. The writ petitioners sought to bring out the lacunae in the election process to be held for the members under Section 19 (1)(a) of the PHARMACY ACT . It was stated that in terms of the Rules of Election which were published in the Calcutta Gazette on 21.07.1966, the Registrar, the second appellant, is empowered to Act as a returning officer for conducting and holding the elections. Rule 2 of the said rules provides for preparation of draft electoral roll followed by the final electoral roll after effecting correction in the said draft, if any. Rule 3 relates to the nomination of candidates whose names appear in the said final roll. Rule 5 provides for a Dispute Redressal Mechanism in case of a

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top