Back
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Arjuna Dass, disciple of H. H. Shri Devenderdassji Varu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endts. II) Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitioner's position and previous orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents' administrative authority and previous complaints. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. past actions against petitioner and nature of complaints. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal standards and principles regarding colorable exercise of power. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. principles of law governing administrative actions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. analysis of jurisdiction and actions of the dharmika parishad. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. court's discretion in terms of inquiry proceedings. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. validity of charges framed against the petitioner. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. grave nature of the charges and legal standards for suspension. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. criteria for suspension and merits of the case. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. temporary appointment of fit person for administration. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 12. non-grant of relief beyond the pleadings. (Para 37 , 38) |
| 13. judgment on the merit of the writ petition. (Para 39) |
| 14. conclusion and dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 40) |
ORDER :
(Subba Reddy Satti, J.)
The above writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
Administrative authority must follow due process and principles of natural justice in disciplinary actions under the applicable statutes, ensuring decisions are not arbitrary or colorable.
The provisions of Sections 50 to 55 of the Act regulate the administration of maths without violating the rights to religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
suspension must be a step in aid to the ultimate result of the investigation or inquiry. The authority also should keep in mind public interest of the impact of the delinquent’s continuance in office....
The Endowment Commissioner's appointment of a Fit Person to administer a religious institution was found illegal, undermining the fundamental right to manage religious affairs.
The requirement of a unanimous resolution by all members of the Dharmika Parishad under Rule 23 of the Dharmika Parishad Rules is mandatory, and the absence of such a resolution invalidates the resol....
The appointment of a 'Fit Person' for managing the Mutt was not justified due to the absence of a temporary vacancy, emphasizing the importance of recognizing legitimate claims for succession under r....
Suspension of an employee must be justified by a strong prima facie case of misconduct involving moral turpitude; arbitrary actions violate constitutional rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
