Back
G. NARENDAR, NYAPATHY VIJAY
Managing Director APSRTC – Appellant
Versus
P. Srinivasa Rao S/o Nancharaiah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G. NARENDAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellants-Corporation and learned counsel for the 1st Respondent.
2. The Appellants is the Employer-Transport Department and this Appeal is preferred being aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge rendered in W.P. No. 18876 of 2021, whereby the learned single Judge was pleased to grant partial relief to the Respondent No. 1 by the following order:
14. The order impugned in the present Writ Petition is hereby set aside and the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner into service, however, the petitioner shall suffer the punis
The court affirmed that disciplinary authorities must adhere to their own binding circulars, and breath analyzer results are not conclusive for imposing severe penalties without further medical evide....
Disciplinary punishment must align proportionately with the severity of the misconduct, and the courts can intervene if the penalty is grossly disproportionate.
Disciplinary authorities have the exclusive jurisdiction to impose penalties for proven misconduct, and courts should not interfere unless findings are irrational or arbitrary.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
