RAVI NATH TILHARI, VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Chintaluri Annapurna, W/o Late Mohana Murali Krishna Babu – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
(Per Dr.Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa)
The instant appeal under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988[for short ‘M.V.Act’] has been filed by the Appellant/Oriental Insurance Company Limited, impugning the Order dated 22.03.2013 passed in M.V.O.P.No.193 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge at Rajahmundry[For short ‘the Tribunal’].
2. Heard Mrs.S.A.V.Ratnam, learned counsel for the Appellant and Sri Hari, learned counsel representing Sri T.D.Pani Kumar, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/Claimants.
3. Learned counsel for the Appellant would submit that the amount of compensation awarded to the claimants is high and the concept of just compensation has been lost sight of. Learned counsel would further submit that the deceased was left only four years one month service, as such, the actual loss of salary has to be taken upto the superannuation period and notional income after the superannuation. Learned counsel would further submit that the deceased is an income tax assessee and 30% of his gross salary has to be deducted towards the income tax. Learned counsel would further submit that the family pens
Krithi and another vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited,. (2021) 2 SCC 166
Lal Dei and others Vs. Himachal Road Transport
Magma General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram and others
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Komal and others
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Others
Rahul Sharma @ another Vs. National Insurance Company Limited and others
Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
United India Insurance Co.Ltd. vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur and Others
Just compensation must be fair and equitable, reflecting the loss suffered; it may exceed the claimed amount, considering future prospects and lawful deductions.
The court emphasized that just compensation must be fair and equitable, affirming that family pension should not be deducted from the compensation amount.
Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must consider gross income without arbitrary deductions and allow future prospects based on statutory guidelines, ensuring just compensation for victims' dep....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of just and reasonable compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the deceased's income, future prospects, loss....
The court emphasized the necessity of awarding just and fair compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, considering future prospects and adjusting interest rates appropriately.
The court emphasized the principle of just and fair compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, including considerations for future prospects and conventional heads.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on oral testimony to determine the deceased's income and the application of established legal principles to modify the compensation am....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's duty to award just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, taking into account recent legal developments and the power of the Court ....
Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be just, fair, and reasonable, considering future prospects and qualifications of the deceased.
Compensation for wrongful death under the Motor Vehicles Act must not deduct pension or insurance benefits; claimants are also entitled to future prospects enhancement regardless of the deceased's ag....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.