SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1399

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT AMARAVATI
K. SURESH REDDY, B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI, JJ.
Jakkam Daniel, Prakasam Dt. - Appellant
Versus
The State Of AP Rep PP – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 724 Of 2016, Criminal Appeal No. 1159 Of 2016
Decided On : 27-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : V. Raghu, Raja Reddy Koneti
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor (AP)

Dying declarations can serve as the sole basis for conviction if they are credible and trustworthy, even without corroboration.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Conviction for murder - Accused convicted based on dying declarations recorded by Head Constable and Judicial Magistrate, which were found to be credible and trustworthy - The deceased was set on fire by the accused due to suspicion of infidelity - The court upheld the conviction, stating that the dying declaration can be a substantive piece of evidence without corroboration if it instills confidence in the court. (Paras 4, 12, 24, 25)

(B) Dying Declaration - The court emphasized that a dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if it is made voluntarily and is credible - The court found no evidence of tutoring or prompting in the statements made by the deceased. (Paras 11, 22, 24)

Facts of the case:
The accused was convicted for murdering his wife by setting her on fire after suspecting her fidelity. The incident occurred on 28.05.2012, and the deceased succumbed to her injuries on 09.06.2012. The prosecution relied on dying declarations recorded in the hospital.

Findings of Court:
The court found the dying declarations credible and upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, confirming the trial court's judgment.

Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused for the offence under Section 302 IPC beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the dying declarations were credible and could be the sole basis for conviction, emphasizing the absence of evidence suggesting they were influenced or coerced.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi, J.)

1. Heard Sri K.Raja Reddy, learned counsel and Sri V.Raghu, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the appellant/accused, and Sri S.Dushyanth Reddy, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

2. The appeal vide CRL.A.No.724/2016 is filed for the sole accused/appellant by Sri V.Raghu, learned Legal Aid Counsel. The appeal vide CRL.A.No.1159/2016 is filed for the sole accused/appellant by Sri K.Raja Reddy, learned counsel engaged by the sole accused/appellant. Both the appeals arose from the judgment dated 11.07.2016 delivered in S.C.99/2014 on the file of the learned VI Addl.District & Sessions Judge, Prakasam at Markapur (hereinafter referred to as ‘trial Court’).

3. Both the appeals are merged and disposed of by a single judgment.

4. The appellant/accused was tried and convicted for the offence U/s.302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity ‘I.P.C.’), and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life, and also to pay fine of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only), in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.

5. The case of the prosecution is that the marriage of accused and Smt.Jakkam Mariyamma (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’) was solemnised six years ago in a church in K.Padu village; they came down to Ambavaram village and residing in the house of Sri V.Kasayya, which is located beside the house of parents of deceased; they blessed with a girl child namely Suguna Rani; the accused habituated to consume alcohol; he was beating and harassing the deceased physically and mentally suspecting her fidelity; he decided to kill the deceased two days prior to the incident in the case; on 28.05.2012 at about 03.30 p.m., the deceased went to answer calls of nature; she returned to home at about 04.00 p.m.; the accused suspected her that she went outside to have sex with others; he became furious and on her arrival, he suddenly poured kerosene on her body, set fire and went away; the deceased raised cries; the neighbours shifted her to the Community Health Centre, Giddalur; on receipt of hospital intimation, Head Constable, Giddalur Police Station visited the hospital and recorded statement of deceased (Ex.P-18); he registered the same as case in Cr.No.126/2012 for the offence U/s.307 I.P.C.; he submitted the original FIR (Ex.P-19) to the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Giddalur and copies to all the concerned; on receipt of intimation from hospital, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Giddalur (P.W-15) visited the hospital and recorded the dying declaration of deceased (Ex.P-26).

(a) During investigation, Head Constable visited hospital examined and recorded the statement of deceased; he also examined and recorded statements of Y.Aseervadamma (P.W-1) mother of deceased, Y.Devabhaktudu (P.W-2) father of deceased, Y.Devadanam (P.W-3), Y.Prabhakar (P.W-4) brothers of deceased, K.Krupamma (P.W-5) sister of deceased, D.Mariyamma (P.W-6) maternal aunt of deceased.

(b) On 29.05.2012 at about 08.30 a.m. Head Constable (P.W-13) accompanied by mediators J.Vijaya Rao (P.W-8) and other visited the scene of offence, got prepared scene observation report (Ex.P-20), seized material objects (M.Os-1 to 5) and got the scene of offence photographed (Ex.P-15) by P.Mohan (P.W-11) and prepared rough sketch of scene of offence (Ex.P-21); he also examined and recorded statements of Y.Devabhaktudu, father of deceased (P.W-2); Y.Devadanam (P.W-3), brother of deceased, D.Mariyamma, Maternal Aunt (P.W-6) and A.Ravikumar, relative of the deceased (P.W-7) and others; the deceased was shifted to the Government Hospital, Nandyal, for better management of the case; later she was referred to Government General Hospital, Kurnool; she was brought to Community Health Centre, Giddalur, on 06.06.2012; the deceased died on 09.06.2012 at about 03.45 a.m. while undergoing treatment.

(c) On receipt of death intimation, Head Constable (P.W-13) altered the section of law and filed a memo to that effect before the Judicial Magistrate o

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top