Back
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, SUMATHI JAGADAM
Biradakota Sita Mahalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Cherukuwada Sambasiva Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal suit is filed, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C. against order and decree dated 14.06.2023 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Bhimavaram, in O.S. (SR) No. 614 of 2023. The plaintiffs in the suit are the appellants herein.
2. Brief facts that are necessary for disposal of this appeal are as follows:
(ii) It is case of the plaintiffs that the suit properties are the ancestral and joint family properties of plaintiffs, defendant Nos.1 and 2 and E.V. Meenakshi Devi and they are entitled to a share in all the suit schedule properties as per succession. The 1st defendant managed the plaint schedule properties till 2017. Later, the 2nd respondent is looking after the plaint schedule properties, as the 1st defendant became sick and bed ridden. The plaintiffs, defendant Nos.1 and 2 and E.V. Meenakshi Devi are in joint and constructive possession of the plaint schedule properties. The plaintiffs came to know that the 1st defendant has a
The court held that plaintiffs, as coparceners, must establish their rights before seeking cancellation of a Settlement Deed, emphasizing the Kartha's lack of authority to alienate joint family prope....
The court ruled that plaintiffs, as coparceners, have the right to challenge a Settlement Deed without prior partition, emphasizing their entitlement under Section 9 of C.P.C.
Settlement deeds executed by family members must comply with statutory requirements to be valid; valid titles can be conferred despite contested ownership claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of property rights based on the source of purchase and the validity of settlement deeds executed within a family.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the Hindu Succession Act and the determination of entitlement to shares in ancestral and self-acquired properties.
The burden of proving the validity of a Settlement Deed lies with the beneficiary, particularly when it deprives other legal heirs of their shares, and evidence must substantiate voluntary execution.
The trial Court must examine the plaint's averments to determine if a cause of action exists, rather than rejecting it based solely on the defendant's claims.
The court established the principle that under the Tamil Nadu Amendment Act 1/1990, a daughter is entitled to her share in ancestral property, and any disposition or alienation without her consent is....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
