Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
H.P.SANDESH
Padmanabha, S/o Late Kalbappa – Appellant
Versus
Shantharaju, S/o Kalbappa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. family properties are subject to both oral and documentary evidence. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellate court affirms property ownership based on earlier arrangements. (Para 4) |
| 3. validity of settlement deed questioned under ptcl act. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court affirms the validity of prior property grants and settlement deeds. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. second appeal dismissed based on previous judgments. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
H.P. SANDESH, J.
1. This matter is listed for admission. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This second appeal is filed against the concurrent finding. The factual matrix of the case while seeking the relief of partition and declaration by the plaintiff, it is contended that suit schedule properties are the joint family properties of plaintiff and defendants and the same are available for partition and also contend in the suit that Smt.Venkatamma had no absolute right to execute the registered settlement deed dated 16.12.2013 in respect of the suit properties and the said settlement deed is not binding on his share. The defendants have appeared and filed written statement and admitted the relationship between the parties and the death of his parents. The defend
Settlement deeds executed by family members must comply with statutory requirements to be valid; valid titles can be conferred despite contested ownership claims.
A settlement deed executed without authority by a deceased father, having only limited rights over property, is null and void, confirming equal shares for all heirs under the Hindu Succession Act.
The court ruled that plaintiffs, as coparceners, have the right to challenge a Settlement Deed without prior partition, emphasizing their entitlement under Section 9 of C.P.C.
A party who has relinquished their rights in joint family properties cannot later claim partition or execute a will regarding those properties.
A partition among heirs was established, and the properties in question were determined to be self-acquired, nullifying the plaintiffs' claims of joint family property.
Execution of partition deed is legally binding and not rendered void by claims of inequity, with established limitations for challenging such deeds. Family settlements must not be reopened unless fra....
A second appeal under Section 100 CPC must raise substantial questions of law; factual disputes decided by lower courts are not reconsidered.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the burden of proof lies with the parties claiming a partition, and without convincing evidence, the court may decree the suit in favor of the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
