Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
S V K Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of AP – Respondent
ORDER :
Subba Reddy Satti, J.
Since the issue involved in all the writ petitions is the same, all the writ petitions are disposed of by way of this common order.
2. Heard Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar, Sri A.Rajendra Babu, Ms.Sodum Anvesha, Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao and Sri Bethapudi Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri R.S.Manidhar Pingali, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services for respondents.
3. Impugning the proceedings whereby the petitioners’ were transferred to different stations, the above writ petitions are filed.
4. Learned counsel for petitioners would submit that the petitioners are office bearers of registered association and hence, the transfer of petitioners without assigning reasons is contrary to G.O.Ms.No.75 Finance (HR.I-PLG. & POLICY) Department, dated 17.08.2024. The transfers of the petitioners since made were contrary to the guidelines/instructions issued in G.O.Ms.No.75 dated 17.08.2024, the said action is arbitrary and hence, the said transfers are vitiated and are liable to be set aside. They would also contend that, in the absence of, any other statutory rules, the government's guidelines have statutory force. No reasons were assigned in th
Transfers of office bearers must adhere to statutory guidelines; failure to do so constitutes arbitrariness, violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Transfer orders must adhere to established guidelines; failure to do so constitutes arbitrariness and violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
The court affirmed that transfer orders are administrative decisions and should not be interfered with unless proven to be arbitrary or in violation of statutory provisions.
Transfers of employees in public service are generally not subject to judicial review unless proven to be arbitrary or in violation of statutory provisions.
Judicial review of transfer orders is limited; transfers made on administrative grounds are valid unless shown to be arbitrary or malicious.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the issue of transfer is a prerogative of the employer, and the courts cannot interfere with transfer orders made on administrative grounds un....
Transfer decisions may prioritize administrative needs over statutory rights; executive guidelines do not impose enforceable rights upon employees regarding transfer policies.
Administrative transfers are not subject to judicial review unless issued by an incompetent authority or based on mala fides, reaffirming the principle that employees cannot claim a right to remain i....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
